If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant, who is a resident of the defendant in Changwon-si, is a resident of Masan-si, who is a resident of Da apartment house D, and the victim E was also a resident of the above apartment house and performed the F Dong Dong representative position.

The defendant was dismissed on March 29, 2019 as the result of the victim's participation in a total of 447 households and 362 households) who was dismissed from office on March 29, 2019 by five members including the victim, from among the seven representatives of the same Dong, who were normally proposed to dismiss the defendant while performing the duties of the chairperson of the representative council of occupants of the above apartment complex, and the defendant was dismissed from office.

I think that the victim did not admit the defendant's argument while he excessively restrains the defendant's speech and behavior, and therefore, I think that the victim disregards the defendant's argument.

According to Article 26 of the above apartment management rules, the same representative as the defendant may present his/her opinion by proposing a bill in accordance with the attached Form of the rules, and according to Article 24 of the above apartment management rules, the chairperson of the tenant representative meeting may order a person who obstructs the maintenance of order or interferes with the progress of the meeting to leave the meeting, and the spectator shall comply with the order of the chairperson. According to Article 14 of the above apartment management rules, the tenant, etc. shall not interfere with the duties of the representative meeting of the tenant, and the tenant, etc. shall not interfere with the duties of the representative meeting of the tenant. Thus, the defendant has a duty to comply

The defendant should hold a public hearing with respect to noise and dust generated in G located near the above apartment complex, or discussed the issue of whether it is necessary to request the construction company to repair defects, and at the same time, did not inform the occupants that his dismissal is unreasonable.