Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On December 23, 2016, the Defendant driven a B taxi on December 23, 2016, while driving the tea hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul in Seoul, was straightly driving along the two-lanes between the two-lanes of the next hospital located in the distance of academic history and the shooting distance of the next hospital from the distance of academic history.

Since there is an intersection where a vehicle signal, etc. is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service confirmed whether there is a vehicle passing through the intersection by reducing speed and checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the duty of care to safely drive the intersection in accordance with the new subparagraph. However, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and received the front part of the victim C( South, 33 years old) driving in violation of the signal and left-hand turn in the direction of the collision.

In the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered from the victim E (the 29-year old), who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, the injury of the franchisium, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment; the injury of the franchisium, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (the 25-year old-age-older) of the same passenger; the injury of the franchisium, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (the 26-year-older), the injury of the franum salt, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim G (the 26-year-older), the injury of the victim H (the 38-year-older), who is the passenger of the Defendant vehicle, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Each written diagnosis and photograph of an accident vehicle;

1. Application of the statutes on traffic accident analysis;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.