When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) set up a pole on two sides of a mine with a width of 5 meters wide from each other in the Gyeongjin-gun, Gyeongjin-gun; and (b) opened the two hacks with a hacks chain connected with a hacks; and (c) prevented the use of the above roads leading to the mine of E in D at the time of T operation, thereby hindering the flow of land.

Summary of Evidence

Since the defendant's partial statement E of the suspect interrogation protocol (including the E's statement) for the defendant to some of the defendant's legal statement of the witness E of the defendant to the prosecutor's office, each police statement protocol for the suspect interrogation protocol for the defendant, agreement for the joint use of roads for G projects and the dispatch of guide to the defendant, request for cooperation on solving the problem of passage through G projects, request for cooperation on the use of roads for G, request for cooperation on mineral transport due to mining operation, cooperation on the commencement of G projects, each of the permission for use of state forests, site photographs, mining register, extension of the period of time (permission for use), request for renewal of national forest use permission, request for cooperation on duty (the confirmation of fact, etc.), investigation report (the telephone statement as to the disposition of interference with passage), investigation report (the explanation of the complaint's cooperation), receipt of investigation report (the receipt of reference materials for investigation report), notification, notification on the receipt of the complaint's request for the selection of public nature of each of the charges in question (Article 106) of the Criminal Act).

The argument is asserted.

However, the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is as follows.