beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.12 2015고단3013

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동감금)

Text

Defendant

B Each fine of KRW 1,00,00, KRW 1,000, Defendant A, C, and D shall be punished by each fine of KRW 500,00.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, including the identity of the Defendants, is the head of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Headquarters for Public Transportation Labor Union I; Defendant B is the K branch of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Headquarters for Public Transport Labor Union I; Defendant C is the head of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Headquarters for Public Transport Labor Union I; Defendant D is the head of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch of the Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch of the Public Transport Labor Union Group.

2. Since around April 1, 2014, M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”) established for the purpose of entrusting the management of the background of the instant case’s building (hereinafter “M”) was entrusted with the work of cleaning the N Hospital children’s ward ward, M was undergoing negotiations to enter into a collective agreement with the N Hospital cleaning labor union (hereinafter “this case’s union”).

The Trade Union of this case was in charge of the previous duties

while M was demanded to succeed to an organization agreement entered into with the service side, M was the situation in which M claimed to enter into a new organization agreement because the size of the service contract and the management status of the company are different from those of the O service.

On October 8, 2014, at around 09:00, the victim P(36) of M’s representative director, the victim Q(35 tax) and the victim R(333 tax) of the team leader held a meeting at the NG Research Institute of Life (NG). The labor union of this case was willing to demand the victims to succeed to the existing organization agreement on this opportunity. On the same day, the labor union of this case had the victims’ vehicles that the labor union members want to return to the company, and prevented Defendant B from getting on board the next side of the automobile.

The victim R demanded the union members to leave the car to sign the car, and the union members taken this Chapter, while the union members prevented the shooting, the union members and the victims caused the wave.

In addition, at around 10:52 on the day, the victim P and Q give up their boarding of a motor vehicle, and the defendant C is in the situation surrounding them, while they go through the walking distance.