Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who has a stimulative disorder in terms of stimulity.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by force for about 10 minutes, such as threatening lids listed on the table table, and threatening customers to get out of the table table, within the “D cafeteria operated by the Victim C (V) located in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, and 1st, the victim C (V, South, and 37 years old) of the first floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines (the amount of fines determined by a summary order in consideration of the fact that the defendant suffers from both polartic disorder and proof of alcohol)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;