교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On November 7, 2008, the Defendant is a person who has been issued a summary order of KRW 1 million with a fine of KRW 1 million with a fine of KRW 1 million with a fine of KRW 7 million with the same crime in the same court on January 13, 2016 at the Suwon District Court on November 7, 2008.
Criminal facts
1. The Defendant is in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) that is a person who is engaged in driving a Grandroth.
At around 01:25 on February 22, 2019, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.057% in blood, proceeded to F from the side of the substigious intersection, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.057%.
Since there is an intersection, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely operating the steering gear and brake system with the driver of the vehicle.
Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim G (Nam and 52 years old) who was under a stop in the direction of the operation due to the negligence of wrong operation of the operation of the operation system while the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and was on the top of the above string of the HK5 car.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, such as dump dump and tensions in need of treatment for about two weeks.
2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was driven by the Defendant from the construction site of I apartment building at the construction site of the I Apartment in the event of the game in the event of the weather weather, and the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of about 0.057% of the blood alcohol concentration at approximately 150 meters in front of the gas station in the event of the game in the event of the game in terms of the temporary landscape set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article.
Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act prohibition on drinking driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the same provision.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. G statements;
1. The actual condition survey report;
1. A report on the status of the driver;