beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.03.11 2014고정19

도로교통법위반

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On May 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a car in Cteas which was parked on the road located in the Tteas-dong, Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si on the front of the Bteas-si; (b) was negligent in not accurately operating electric power lines, brakes, etc.; and (c) received the back portion of E Laren-car, which is owned by the victim D, parked in the front bank, as the front portion of the Defendant’s car.

The Defendant damaged the property to cover KRW 1,269,209 with the repair cost of the victim by occupational negligence as above.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under the main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim withdraws his intent to punish the defendant after the institution of the prosecution in this case. Thus, the prosecution in this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the