beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.09.28 2017나622

사육비

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 12, 2007, I agricultural partnership (hereinafter “instant agricultural partnership”) is a corporation incorporated pursuant to Article 15 of the former Framework Act on Agriculture and Rural Community (wholly amended by Act No. 8749, Dec. 21, 2007; before the name was changed to the Framework Act on Agriculture, Rural Community and Food Industry; and thereafter, the establishment, operation, support, etc. of the farming partnership system under the said Act was transferred to the Act on Fostering and Supporting Agricultural and Fisheries Enterprises enacted by Act No. 9260, Apr. 1, 2009).

B. On October 6, 2011, the instant agricultural partnership entrusted the Plaintiff with the raising of Catia 39,100 mari, and the Plaintiff sent and supplied 36,986 mariri, raised to the instant agricultural partnership on January 17, 2012.

Around that time, the instant farming association issued the Plaintiff with a face value of KRW 37,235,00 per share in return for the above consignment raising, but the said check was in default.

C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the instant farming association corporation as the Jeonju District Court’s Jeonju District Court’s 2015Kadan12, and the said court rendered a judgment on November 3, 2015 that “The instant farming association corporation shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 37,235,00 and 15% per annum from June 28, 2015 to the date of full payment.”

The above judgment was finalized on November 21, 2015. D.

around 2012, the number of contribution units of the instant agricultural partnership was 150,000 shares. Of them, Defendant C owned 65,00 shares, Defendant D and F owned 35,00 shares, Defendant E, G and H owned 5,00 shares, respectively.

[Grounds for recognition of Defendant C and D] Article 208(3)3 (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (based on the service by public notice) (based on the recognition of Defendant E and H), the fact that there is no dispute, the entries in subparagraphs 1 through 3 (including each number), and the purport of the entire pleadings [based on the recognition of Defendant G and F] Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act.