물품대금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 90,544,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from August 27, 2013 to October 14, 2013.
1. The facts in each of the following facts can be recognized by comprehensively considering the overall purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 7 alone are insufficient to determine and determine the above recognition, and there is no other counter-proof.
The plaintiff is a merchant who engages in the sale of multimond in the trade name of "C".
B. From August 16, 2013 to August 26, 2013, the Plaintiff continued to provide the Defendant with a multimond, and the amount unpaid in relation to the said multimond is equivalent to KRW 90,544,00.
2. Determination:
A. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay the above amount of KRW 90,544,000 to the plaintiff and the delay damages therefor.
B. The defendant is not the defendant, but the person who purchased Damond from the plaintiff, and the defendant is merely a person who purchased Damond from the plaintiff and delivered Damond to the above D, but the defendant's above assertion is not accepted in light of the evidence adopted earlier.
C. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 90,544,00 as well as damages for delay calculated by each of the following rates from August 27, 2013 to October 14, 2013, the delivery date of a copy of the instant complaint, from August 27, 2013, to October 14, 2013, which is the day following the final payment date of the Damond price, to the Plaintiff.
3. According to the conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.