매매대금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. Judgment of the court of first instance No. 1-E
(b).
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding the following contents, after the 8th 12 of the judgment of the first instance, following the 12th 12 of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In the event that multiple contracts were concluded by Ghana, whether the entire contract is indivisible as if it were a single contract should be determined by comprehensively taking into account the details and purpose of the conclusion of the contract, the intent of the parties, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2000Da54659, May 16, 2003; 2004Da54633, Jul. 28, 2006). In light of the developments leading up to the conclusion of the contract of this case and the contents of the contract, it is reasonable to deem that the contract of this case was made in whole with economic and factual entirety, including the transfer of the real estate of this case and the right to authorize the establishment of a child care center. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion seeking partial revocation of the premium contract on the right to authorize the establishment of a child care center cannot
3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be accepted within the extent of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed due to the lack of reasonable grounds.
The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Disposition of the first instance judgment is completed.
Since it is obvious that "in respect of the flag" is a clerical error in this paragraph, it shall be corrected.