If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant, at the “C” mobile phone sales store located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, became aware of E through the introduction of the Defendant’s former wife D. On January 3, 2014, the Defendant solicited E to subscribe to the mobile phone and received and possessed the identification card from E as a mobile phone transmission.

1. On January 3, 2014, in preparing a mobile phone name change contract at the above “C” mobile phone sales store without E’s consent, the Defendant entered the name column in the “E”, “F”, “F”, and “E” in the name column in the resident number column, and signed the name “E”, respectively. < Amended by Act No. 12134, Jan. 3, 2014>

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the right, the Defendant forged a contract for change in the name of mobile phone.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, exercised the instant investigation document by sleeping and transmitting the forged mobile phone name change contract to employees in charge of H agency name, a superior agency, who is unaware of the circumstances.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a title change contract, currency details, and charge statement;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of forged private documents) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;