유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the judgment on the allegations of both parties surrounding the medical record appraisal conducted in this court, and thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Appraisal of medical records in this court and determination thereof
A. According to the medical record appraisal entrusted to the head of Seoul Medical Center (Vocational Environment Department), according to the above appraisal entrusted by this court, C (hereinafter “the deceased”) constitutes pneumoconiosis-type A at the time of death, and the acute aggravation of chronic closed-pulmonary disease also constitutes symptoms that may arise from pneumoconiosis, and is related to cardiopulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary tion or pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary tion. As such, the death of the deceased is determined as the main cause of death of the death of the deceased.
However, the result of the above appraisal commission is based on only the medical records remaining without the autopsy of the deceased and presumed a private person. It does not necessarily mean that the credibility is superior to the result of the appraisal commission by the court of the first instance (the Repulmonary department of the Mancheon National University Seoul Hospital). The plaintiff asserts that the result of the appraisal entrustment by the court of the first instance was more accurate since the result of the appraisal entrustment by the court of the first instance was newly added to the CT Reading compared to that of the result of the appraisal entrustment by the court of first instance without the CT Reading data. However, the CT reading data is more accurate, but it does not necessarily mean that the CT reading data was more than twice on August 7, 2006 and May 20, 2011, and it does not necessarily mean that it is true in view
After receiving the decision on medical care for pneumoconiosis on February 13, 1997, the Deceased is close to 12 years from August 31, 2002 until February 7, 2014.