If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The facts charged are modified to the extent that it does not affect the guarantee of the defendant's right to defense according to the facts admitted by evidence.

On November 25, 2013, around 23:50 on November 25, 2013, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol in a dnonasium located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, had discovered and found the F and Security G from the police box affiliated with the police station, which received the report of illegal business, and prevented the Defendant from entering the F and G with the police station, along with his name-free boxes.

As G notified that he would arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, the defendant tried to go out of the singing room, but the defendant saw that he will sing down by F, sing off the F's arms, sing off the fat, and sing off the fat, and "I am unable to do so, sing off the fat, sing off the fat, we see equally the snow in the fat, and in the fatch."

In addition, the F set up the Defendant at the time of diving, and the Defendant assaulted F by drinking the chest of F, such as making it possible for F to take the breast part of F, and f to catch F’s f’s breath.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the lawful execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of Fman.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A statement recorded on the fourth public trial by the witness F; and

1. The defendant and his defense counsel, as a result of reproduction and viewing of video data [No. 61 pages of evidence records], asserts that the defendant did not assault F in his/her patrolman;

However, in light of the fact that F has consistently made a statement from an investigative agency to this court that he/she used to assault himself/herself as stated in the Defendant’s ruling, and that the content of the statement is considerably detailed and thus credibility, and that the situation at the time when G’s statement and F’s video materials can be verified as a result of reproduction and viewing corresponds to F’s statement, it is sufficient to conduct the act as described in the Defendant’s ruling.