2. The crime of this case is a so-called “singing” crime which actually causes damage to an unspecified number of victims, which is difficult to recover by means of planned and systematic methods, and its nature is not very good.

The role of the defendant is an essential part that is essential to the establishment of a crime, and there is a high need for strict punishment for the subordinate staff in order to eradicate such crime.

The defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was under probation due to habitual acquisition of stolen property.

In addition, in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of crimes, details, results, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and pleadings, the first instance sentence is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit