Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On September 19, 2018, around 08:52 around 08:52, the Defendant left a room owned by the victim D, which contains a passbook, seal, etc. in the city where the Defendant left the room to go to the toilet.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV image image data;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (when a sentence of suspension of execution is invalidated or revoked);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected in the suspended sentence.

- the amount of damage is minor, the amount of damage was immediately returned, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant.

- There is no record of criminal punishment for the same offense, and only one fine has been punished for a long time in fraud.

- Other methods of crime, circumstances after crimes, mental disorders of the defendant, basic living recipients, etc. shall be determined as ordered in full view of the following: