except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 13, 2012, the Defendant appeared as a witness in Seoul Southern District Court No. 409 on November 13, 2012 in the fraud case against the above court No. 2012, No. 2602 C and D.

After taking an oath, the Defendant: “At the time of August 14, 2010, at the time of 00:45, a witness got involved in driving E in a vehicle with E in a state of drinking and confiscing the F low-speed passenger vehicle. immediately after the accident, D left the vehicle in the said high-speed passenger vehicle, but did not memory whether the contents of D were met. There is no additional drinking. There is no fact that C and D left the scene immediately after the accident occurred. There was an agreement on the insurance process of C and D, leaving the site, went back to 4 to 5 minutes after leaving the site, and going back to 4 to 5 minutes after leaving the site. After the accident, G employees of the insurance company, “after having caused the accident, the other party requested G to take a fluoring an accident by inserting a weak point in the inside and demanding it to receive the insurance accident.”

However, the fact was that the defendant had drinking alcohol at the time, driving the above body-man car at the time, caused the accident that led to the above low-level car, and as at the time of the accident, there was no communication with D with D because D did not see the above low-level car at the time of the accident, and there was no fact that D had talked with D. In addition, in order to conceal the fact that the driver was driving immediately after the accident, and there was a fact that D had a drinking alcohol on a nearby H building by leaving the site to conceal the fact that the driver was driving immediately after the accident occurred, and after the date of the accident, D reported the fact that he was driving to the above G as the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as above and raised perjury.

This Court tried at the Seoul Southern District Court 2012 High Court 2602 fraud case against C and D in parallel with this case. On August 23, 2013, this Court sentenced C and D to each fine of 5.