beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.09 2015가단55768

자동차인도

Text

1. The defendant shall deliver the vehicle listed in the attached list to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the facts of the reasons for the claim are acknowledged.

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to deliver the vehicle listed in the attached list to the plaintiff.

On this issue, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's request due to the reasons such as the plaintiff's non-compliance with the request for return of defects in the automobile, but the plaintiff's non-compliance with it

However, since there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's assertion, the above argument is without merit.

(A) On January 27, 2016, the Defendant submitted a written reply stating the above purport, and did not appear on the date of open conciliation on March 2, 2016. On April 7, 2016, the Defendant did not submit a preparatory document stating detailed arguments by attending the date of open pleading on April 7, 2016, and did not appear on May 12, 2016, which is the date of next pleading. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is justified and acceptable.