beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.29 2015노4410

위증

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the case where the Seoul Southern District Court 2008Na20033, the Seoul Southern District Court 2007 Division 25234, which was the case related to the claim for construction cost as Seoul Southern District Court 2008Na6033, the Seoul Southern District Court 2007 Division 25234, and the Seoul Southern District Court 2013 Division 2646, the court decided that the person who was awarded a subcontract with H for the construction of the structural mold mold 2646, cannot be deemed as F or that he was a dynamic G. G was also present as a witness in the above High Court case and stated to the effect that he was to leave F only for any inevitable reason after he was awarded an oral subcontract with H, and the defendant stated to the effect that he only 3rd District Court 600, the above Seoul Southern District Court 208 Division 203, which was the party for the claim for construction cost as 11312, the defendant's testimony in the above Seoul Southern District Court 2008.

B. The sentence sentenced by the court below to the defendant (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Facts charged