재임용자동탈락무효확인등
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff B shall be modified as follows:
The defendant on March 5, 2013 to the plaintiff B.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following part, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The order shall be replaced by the annexed sheet of the judgment of the court of first instance in the annexed sheet of this judgment.
On the fourth 4th 8th 201, the judgment of the first instance court “2.2.14” shall be deemed to be “.2.12, 2013,” and “the person who was ordered to make a decision, and the Defendant, from that time,” shall be deemed to be “from that time. The Defendant shall revise the above provisional disposition to “from that time when the Plaintiffs applied for it.”
“The term of appointment of the plaintiffs was until March 31, 2013, respectively under the employment contract,” at the fourth lower end of the judgment of the first instance court, “The plaintiff was reappointed on April 1, 2005 and the term of appointment was from April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2013,” respectively, and “the expiration of the term of appointment expires” at the fifth lower end of the same face, and at the same end, at the same time, at the same time, at the fourth (hereinafter “instant notice”).
The following provisions (Article 53-2(7) of the Private School Act) shall be added between six pages 13 and fourteen.
(7) In deliberating on whether the teachers' personnel committee is reappointed under paragraph (6), it shall be based on objective grounds, such as evaluation of the following matters, which are determined by school regulations:
In such cases, the teacher concerned shall be present at the teachers' personnel committee on the designated date and state his/her opinion or give him/her an opportunity to present his/her opinion in writing, within a fixed period not less
1. Matters concerning the education of students;
2. Matters relating to academic research; and
3. Matters concerning the guidance for students shall be revised with “Evidence A 1 to 9” at the bottom of six pages of the judgment of the court of first instance with “Evidence A 1, 2, 4 through 9, 14 through 23, and 29.”
The term "13 years" in the 7th sentence of the first instance court shall be "2013", the term "disadvantageous treatment" in the 6th sentence of the same 7th sentence shall be "disadvantageous treatment", and the same amnesty.