beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.06.19 2018나59368

구상금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below is revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant B organization (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), with respect to the E vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 1”), the Defendant C organization (hereinafter “Defendant 2”) is a mutual aid operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to F vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

B. On November 9, 2017, the defendant 2 stated 19:15:15:15:15:34:34: (a) the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 2, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 2, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 1, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 2, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 2, the receipt of the accident on the part of the accident on the part of the defendant 1, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 2, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 1, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 2, the receipt of the accident on the part of the defendant 1, the receipt of the accident on the part of subparagraph 1-4, and the receipt of the accident on the part of subparagraph 1-6:19:34 of the last accident on the part of the defendant 2, rather than on the receipt of the accident on the part of the accident.

While proceeding along the two lanes near the IC, the two lanes have been reduced from the three lanes to the two lanes, the two lanes conflicted with the G vehicle immediately preceding the road section in which the two lanes have been reduced from the two lanes, and the said G vehicle stops over the two lanes and the two lanes.

(hereinafter “Prior Accident”) C.

In accordance with the preceding accident of this case, when the two and three lanes are obstructed, vehicles passing through the above preceding accident points have gone slowly, and vehicles passing through the above preceding accident points have gone through one lane through two lanes by straight or change of lanes. Defendant 1 and vehicles for the plaintiff were passing through the above preceding accident points around 19:34 on the same day.

At the time, Defendant 1’s vehicle is located in two lanes, Plaintiff 1.