When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On April 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) from around 15:50 to around 16:30 to around 16:30, the Defendant was present at the meeting of the “National Assembly of the 1st century 1st century” where more than 10,000 people are present at the meeting of the Seoul plaza located in Tae-gu Seoul, Seoul, Seoul, to 4:16 Joint Organization; (b) from around 16:30 of the same day to around 6,000 women attending the meeting, the Defendant occupied the front lane with the participants of the meeting in front of the meeting, with more than 6,00 people and more than 6,00 people who participated in the meeting, and moved along with the front door of the vehicle in front of the front door with the vehicle in front of the meeting.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

2. On April 18, 2015, the Defendant, in response to the dispersion order, occupied by 6,00 participants in the assembly at the position of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, with the former one at around 19:00, while leaving the 6,000 roads before the conference, certain participants were present at the National Assembly of the 1st century in the Sewol ferry, and committed an act such as getting wire ropes on the police bus or attaching the police glass bus. Accordingly, the Defendant and other participants did not comply with the demand for voluntary dispersion by the chief of the police station on the grounds that the chief of the police station was authorized by the chief of the police station, but the participants of the assembly, including the Defendant, requested voluntary dispersion on the ground that they did not meet the demand for voluntary dispersion.

Therefore, even though the director of the security division issued the first dispersion order in around 19:20 on the same day, the second dispersion order in around 19:27 on the same day, the third dispersion order in around 19:37 on the same day, the fourth dispersion order in around 19:54 on the same day, and the fourth dispersion order in around 20:12 on the same day, the defendant did not immediately dissolve.

Accordingly, the Defendant refused to comply with the legitimate dispersion order by the head of the police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A copy of the investigation report (a copy of the National Countermeasures Council’s “National Action Day”;