beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.02.18 2013고정1626

집회및시위에관한법률위반

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven hundred thousand won.

2. Defendants each of the above facts.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the president of the EM of the D Organizations, and the defendant B is the director of the organization of the same organization.

Any person who intends to hold an outdoor assembly or demonstration shall file a report in advance by submitting a report stating the date, time, place, etc. to the chief of the competent police station.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인들은 2013. 3. 5. 11:10경부터 같은 날 11:25경까지 사이에 창원시 성산구 사림동 1에 있는 경남도청 앞에서, 소속 회원 약 30여명과 함께 “대기업의 농업생산 진출 저지를 위한 투쟁선포식, 농민들의 단결된 힘으로 F그룹 박살내자”라는 플래카드 1장과 “대기업은 농업생산을 중단하라” 등이 기재된 피켓 10여개, “거부 G 청과” 등이 기재된 소형 벽보 6개, 방송엠프 1개, 볏단 1개를 준비한 다음, 피고인 A은 “H은 대규모 토마토 농장 건립을 철회해야 한다.”는 내용으로 발언하고, 참가한 회원들과 함께 “대기업 농업 진출을 막아 내자, H 각성하라.”는 내용의 구호를 제창하였으며, 피고인 B은 볏짚에 불을 붙인 후 위 소형 벽보 2개를 소훼하는 방법으로 사실상의 집회를 주최하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to hold an outdoor assembly that was not reported in collusion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (in the case of the Defendant B, the date on which the second trial is made);

1. A report on the commencement of investigation and the report on information status;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing evidence photographs;

1. Article 22 (2) and Article 6 (1) of the Act on the elective Assembly and Demonstration concerning Criminal Facts and Articles 30 of the Criminal Act;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.