건물명도
1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and Defendant C, as part of the attached Table No. 5, are the movable properties indicated in the attached Table No. 4.
The plaintiff's facts of the cause of the claim of this case are as shown in the reasons for the claim of this case. Accordingly, the defendant B and C shall be deemed to have led to confession under Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act, and as to the defendant D, they may be acknowledged by each of the statements in Gap evidence 1 through 5.
Defendant D cannot deliver the real estate listed in the attached Table 9 to Defendant D before being paid KRW 160 million. However, according to the above evidence, the Plaintiff’s payment of the above security deposit to Defendant D by December 1, 2017. Thus, Defendant D’s above assertion cannot be accepted.
Defendant D also asserts that the above real estate cannot be transferred until the director's expenses and the repair expenses for the waterworks can be paid. However, Defendant D's obligation to pay the above expenses is a preferential performance relationship than Defendant D's obligation to deliver the real estate.
Since the defendant D cannot be seen as having a simultaneous performance relationship, the above assertion by the defendant D cannot be accepted.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is decided as per Disposition by admitting it.