채무부존재확인
1. The claim of this case is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On December 9, 2015, Nonparty C and D, who entered into a contract for the consignment sale of each telecommunications product with the Defendant Branch Co., Ltd. (the Defendant’s agent), entered into and received from the Plaintiff an application for the use of a service organization (hereinafter “application 1 of this case”) with the content of LG U Internet and TV monthly charges of KRW 150,00 (excluding value-added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply), 36 months during the agreed period, and 36 months in each room, including the details of the multi-family house E (19 households; hereinafter the “multi-household house of this case”).
B. On January 27, 2016, around 2016, an application for the use of a service organization with the content of U-Internet 23 lines, including 177,100 won, U-TV 23 lines (one time line, distribution type, tVG, and 22 lines) monthly charges, each of which contains the details of each of the Mifi installation, automatic transfer, etc. (hereinafter “instant application for the use of the instant multi-household”).
C. On January 27, 2016, the Defendant opened and handled LG U Internet and TV services related to the instant multi-household housing [name B2 (25), period from January 27, 2016 to January 26, 2019; hereinafter “instant service product”; hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the Plaintiff. The instant service product charges, etc. were 354,070 won (22 March 22, 2016), 355,820 won (20th March 22, 2016), e.g., automatic gold transfer from May 23, 2016 to June 35, 2016 (200 to June 35, 2016), and Plaintiff 200 to May 23, 2016 (200 to June 25, 2016).
The instant service product was terminated as of October 28, 2016 upon the Plaintiff’s request, and the Defendant delegated debt collection for penalty of KRW 6,975,297 to Nonparty considered credit information in consideration of the fact that the instant service product was terminated as of October 28, 2016, and the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the acceptance of debt collection on January 2017.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 3, 7.