When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On 07:50 on 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 07. 050, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim F, a police officer affiliated with the E box, who was called “D” operated by the Defendant, who was called “D” and called “Neas is identified as to the identity of Neas pertaining to the kind of c and female employees, and was cut back,” thereby insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on accusation and video CDs;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Around 07:50 on July 03, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 07:50 on the charge of assaulting part of the facts charged, the Defendant collected her mother and her face used while taking the victim’s bath on the ground that he was satisfed in shocks from “D” operated by the victim C (the 54 years of age) in Osan City B; (b) 2-3 times her face; and (c) her face was 2-3 times her her bal, thereby committing assault by drinking the victim’s head; and (d) her her hand.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

(c) Expression of intention not to punish: Agreement submitted on September 21, 2015, which was after the institution of public prosecution of this case.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.