부당이득금
1. It is confirmed that an insurance contract entered in the separate sheet concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is invalid.
2. The defendant.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company that entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant insurance”). The Defendant is the policyholder, the insured, and the beneficiary of the instant insurance.
B. After entering into the instant insurance contract with the Plaintiff from June 10, 207 to March 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concluded the instant insurance contract with the Plaintiff, on the following grounds: B hospital, C hospital, DNA surgery, Tol University hospital, Ethical surgery, F-type surgery, G-type surgery, H clinic, etc.; (b) in the G-type surgery; (c) in the I-type surgery; (d) catitis; (d) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (e) catitis; (f) 4-5 patch escape; (f) catitis; (f) 3-5, 40,000,000 per the instant insurance contract; and (f) kneeume, 17,70,000 per the instant insurance contract.
The details of the accident and the date of hospitalization, 207-00 207-07-207 - 2060-207 - 200-207 - 200-7 25 - 07 - 20-4 - 06 - 07 - 200-4 - 06 - 07 - 207 - 207 - 06 - 207 - 200-4 - 206 - 20-4 - 3 -4 - 60 - 6 - 20 - 6 - 3 - 20 Mali-4 - 5 - 100 Mali-25 -4 - 10 - 190 Mali-25 - 5 - 10 -20 - 3 -4 - 5 -