난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, thereby citing this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article
[Additional Decision] The Plaintiff asserts that “The Plaintiff’s family members are faced with the situation where the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s family members feel threatened with her life from SJMta Jirya M&C (SM).” However, in light of the evidence adopted by the first instance court as seen earlier, the Plaintiff’s political situation and judicial system, the Plaintiff’s entry route, the period of entry into the Republic of Korea, the number of visits after entry into the Republic of Korea, the process of application for refugee status, etc., it is difficult to find that the Plaintiff might suffer persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion. The Plaintiff’s allegation that the date of preparation No. 5 was before the Plaintiff applied for refugee status, but only submitted as evidence for refugee status, is difficult to view that the Plaintiff’s family members were unable to be considered to be able to be considered to be more than 5 years old at the time of entry into the Republic of Korea, and that the Plaintiff’s family members could not be considered to be more than 5 years old.”
2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is without merit.