However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle in C the test.

1. On October 12, 2014, at around 19:15, the Defendant driven a car with approximately 3km of about 0.14% alcohol level while under the influence of alcohol level 0.14%, from the front of the designated middle school located in the designated area of Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, to the e-mail front of the bank located in the same side.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act driving a motor vehicle with the above test at around 19:15 on October 12, 2014, along with one lane in the direction of the designation of the intersection in front of the above e-mail box at the front of the mountain patrol box.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly manipulating the steering gear and brakes, which are well examined before, after and after the driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the compacter driving by the victim F, who is driving on the right side from the left side of the running direction of the Defendant, due to the negligence of driving under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph (1).

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as scarke, which requires approximately four weeks of treatment due to occupational negligence, and damaged the above compacter so that the repair cost of KRW 12,045,000, such as maintenance, etc. of scarlet chain exchange.

3. A motor vehicle owner who has violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall subscribe to the mandatory insurance bearing the responsibility for paying a certain amount of money to the victim when another person dies or is injured due to the operation of the motor vehicle, and shall not operate the motor vehicle which is not covered by the mandatory insurance

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as a holder of the foregoing thesis car, operated the foregoing thesis car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1...