2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and supports the wife with visual disability.

However, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, the Defendant purchased 2.5 g 2,200,000 won over four occasions, and the volume of the Defendant purchased Mept 2,000,000 won, despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished as a narcotics crime despite the fact that the Defendant committed the instant narcotics crime, and that the crime was not less than that of the instant narcotics crime, and that the form of the crime was not less than that of an individual, home, society, and human as a whole, and that it is necessary to punish the Defendant with severe punishment in light of the fact that the instant crime resulted in degradation of the entire criminal act beyond that of an individual, and that other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., do not seem to be unfair because the sentence imposed by the lower court is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.