손실보상금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Business authorization and public notice - Water Resources Development Project (the Han River Water System Coordination Project) - Public notice of business approval: Defendant on June 7, 201, No. 2011-170, and June 4, 2012, public notice of the Seoul Regional Land Management Office of National Land No. 2012-176:
B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on May 23, 2013 - Land subject to expropriation: The following table is indicated as “land subject to expropriation”:
(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands” and individually named, “the instant lands” - Compensation for losses according to the sequences below: The following table is as indicated.
- Commencement date of expropriation: June 24, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation for a stock company and the Korea Appraisal Board;
C. The ruling by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on January 23, 2014 (hereinafter “Objection”) - Contents of the ruling: The following table is as indicated.
- Certified public appraisal corporations: Korean C&T corporations, and D&T corporations.
D. The result of the court’s entrustment to the appraiser B (hereinafter “court appraiser B”, and the result of the court’s entrustment to the appraiser B is referred to as “court’s appraisal”) - The contents of the appraisal are as indicated below in the “court’s appraisal amount” column.
In the table, the amount of the adjudication on expropriation of the land (hereinafter referred to as Pyeongtaek-si C) subject to expropriation is 53,194,620,620,620,620,53,00 in total 52,279,52,270,279,200, 52,136,100,00 53,194,62053,62053,059,880 (unit: won) / [Grounds for Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, 5, 2-1, 3-1, 3-1 of evidence No. 1-5, 2-1, 3-1 of this Court, the result of the appraisal of the appraiser B of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The compensation determined by the Plaintiff’s assertion of objection is not only the amount of compensation calculated by selecting a comparative standard with each land of this case and its specific use area, but also the individual factors.