However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a business owner who operates commercial sex acts with the trade name of “C” from Nos. 304 and 306 of the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City building B.

The Defendant, from November 18, 2016 to November 21, 2016, hired D at the above “C” business, and found D and received an amount equivalent to KRW 150,000 from an unspecified number of men who used to find the said business, and provided sexual traffic for seven occasions, thereby mediating sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Each statement of E and D;

1. The 112 reported case processing table, on-site photographs, and closures of advertisements, and copies of the monthly rent agreement No. 304 and 306 of real estate, and text messages;

1. Each protocol of seizure and list of seizure of the police;

1. A report on internal investigation (net 12);

1. Application of investigation reports (specific amount of collection acquired in return for sexual traffic) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including the relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the selection of punishment for the crimes (the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The latter part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic;

1. The fact that the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, etc. is disadvantageously considered, the confession and depth of the defendant is being committed, the business period of this case is not long and there are no profits therefrom, and the fact that the defendant has no records of being punished in excess of the fine, etc., shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime.