When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim D (S)(S) working for the victim D(S) located in C at Jeju on May 29, 2015 to repair the vehicle; (b) requested the repair of the vehicle to repair the vehicle, but the damaged person does not repair the vehicle on the day.

In other words, the victim was aware of the complaint, and at the same place the victim expressed his desire to "the same fat, fat, e.g., e., patch," and assaulted the victim by drinking fating fat of the victim with his hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not admit that the amount of fine prescribed in the summary order is excessive, and there is no change of circumstances that can be considered after the summary order, and thus, it is decided as ordered by the summary order to maintain the amount of fine under the summary order, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime; (b) the overall conditions for sentencing indicated in the record, such as the circumstances after the crime; and (c) the criminal records of the defendant in a similar case (a) and the criminal records of the defendant (a fine, a suspended sentence, a criminal record).