2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around November 22, 2009, the Defendant issued 30 million won at a discount of 470,530,000 won for household check from the victim's seat, i.e., at a discount of 300,000 won for household check from the victim's seat, i.e., at a discount of 470,000 won for household check, i.e., at a discount of 30,000 won for household check from the victim's seat, i.e., at a discount of 10,000 won for household check from the victim's seat, i.e., at a discount of 30,000 won for 470,000 won for household check, i.e., at a discount of 30,000 won for 30,500 won for household check from the victim's seat, i.e., at a discount of 30,500 won for the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. Statement made by the police against D;

3. Copy of the transaction of passbook.

4. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of household checks;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the injured party does not want the punishment of the accused).