beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.08.20 2020고단1701

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 20:45 on January 30, 2020, the Defendant, as a holder of the KS5 car, operated the said car without mandatory insurance in the vicinity of the intersection of the D Hospital in front of the D Hospital located in the C, Y, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the Mandatory Insurance Council (Ma1) and the Mandatory Insurance Council (Ma1 Driver) to a report on traffic accidents in which a defendant's legal statement or statement has occurred;

1. Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation and Selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a car BK5 vehicle.

On January 30, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car at around 20:45, and proceeded to turn to the left at the direction of the parking lot of the D Hospital in the direction of the D Hospital parking lot in the area of the E Hospital.

At night and its location was a private-distance intersection where signal lights are not installed, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as the ebbbb and temporary suspension or slowly driving before entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the intersection without doing so and without doing so, and did not discover the victim F (F, South, age 61) who entered the said intersection from the e.g. e., from the e.g. e., the e., e., from the e.g. e., the offline to the E Hospital, and did not discover the e.g., TS600 electric wheel, which was operated by the victim F (F, South, and the age 61). As the front part of the said vehicle operation, the Defendant e.g.,

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the cutting of the upper frame, to the right side in need of treatment for about 14 weeks due to such occupational negligence.