For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendant of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) and the defrauded L.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence inconsistent with logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine

In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only a case on which death penalty, imprisonment with or without labor for an indefinite term or for not less than ten years has been pronounced, an appeal may be filed on the ground that the judgment of the court below had influenced

Therefore, in this case where a more minor sentence was rendered against the defendant, the argument that the court below erred in finding evidence selection and probative value, or in finding facts based on it, or that it points out legal principles on the premise of facts different from the facts recognized by the court below is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.