2...

Defendant

A는 부산 동래구 F게임랜드’ 업주이고, 피고인 B은 환전상이며, 피고인 C은 위 게임장 종업원이다. 1. 피고인 A, B의 게임산업진흥에관한법률위반 피고인 A는 F게임랜드 업주로서 전체 영업을 총괄하고 종업원을 고용하며 손님을 유치하는 역할, 피고인 B은 게임장 밖에서 손님들에게 환전을 해주는 역할을 하기로 공모하였다. 피고인들은 2011. 11. 27. 20:30경 F게임랜드에서 오션캐슬 게임기 40대를 설치하고 그 버튼 위에 자동으로 버튼을 누르는 기계인 일명 ‘똑딱이'를 두어 손님들의 이용에 제공하고, 피고인 B은 게임장 밖에서 대기하고 있다가 게임 결과로 배출되는 경품인 은갈피(개당 5,000원)를 1개당 500원을 공제하고 4,500원에 환전하였다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to do gambling and other speculative acts using game products.

2. On November 27, 201, Defendant C’s Defendant C’s violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, even though he was well aware of the fact that Defendant A and B used game products in F Gameland to allow customers to gamble and perform other speculative acts, as described in paragraph (1), and aided and abetting the Defendant as an employee, such as cleaning and diameter.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A and B: Article 44 (1) 1 and Article 28 subparagraph 2 of the respective Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

(b) Defendant C: Articles 44(1)1 and 28 subparag. 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant C who is legally mitigated: Articles 32 (2) and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant of the provisional payment order.