However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 29, 2016, the Defendant, at the end of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 293, 293, sent to the si in front of the 22-gil Park Park, and received a report that he did not pay the fee, and confirmed the circumstances of the occurrence of the case, and sent the report to C, who was affiliated with the Seocheon-gu Police Station B police station, which confirmed the circumstances of the occurrence of the case, “I will not come to this rings, and will not go to the inside,” and carried the her chest in hand, and spathd it with both hand, and spathd several times.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above police officer and interfered with his legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

2. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1)(the following favorable circumstances) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as per the Disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) the basic area (from June to January 1) (no person in charge of special sentencing) (no person in charge of sentencing) (the decision of sentencing is deemed to be erroneous to a certain extent; (b) the primary offender is the first offender; and (c) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is relatively insignificant.