2. Although the victims expressed their intention not to punish the Defendant at the investigative agency and the court below, the court below seems to have determined punishment in consideration of the above favorable circumstances for the Defendant, and the court below did not accept the Defendant’s assertion on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant had a history of serving a sentence for the same kind of crime; (b) the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes again during the period of repeated crimes; (c) the Defendant again committed the instant crimes in 2018 Highest 1670, while being investigated as the case in 2018 Highest 1513; (d) there was no change in special circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below was issued; and (e) other factors such as the Defendant’s age, sex, family relation, motive, means, results, and circumstances after the crime.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.