A. On January 15, 2015, the Defendant concluded an investment agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on the planning and production of the musical elements of “C” (hereinafter “C”), and the Plaintiff entered into an investment agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to invest KRW 50,000,000 in the production cost of the instant musical elements.

(B) On January 14, 2015, the preceding day, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff an investment contract, such as the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 3-2, but this is merely a form of a contract with no signature or seal affixed by both the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and it is difficult to conclude that the investment agreement was concluded as it is.

한편 피고는 그 전날인 2015. 1. 14. 주식회사 에니웍스와 사이에 대학로 뮤지컬센터 대극장을 대관료 437,320,000원에 대관하기로 약정하면서, 2015. 1. 28. 1차 계약금으로 48,105,200원, 2015. 2. 18. 2차 계약금으로 96,210,400원, 2015. 4. 17. 중도금으로 192,420,800원, 2015. 6. 26. 잔금으로 144,315,600원을 지급하기로 정하였다.

C. On January 27, 2015, the Defendant entered into each service contract providing D with the production supervision service of the instant musical work, E with the production production production supervision service, work as producer, F with the production supervision service.

On February 10, 2015, the Defendant paid KRW 15,308,968 in the aggregate of KRW 3,466,744, KRW 3,520,337, KRW 3,020,337, KRW 5,301,550 as the down payment of the above service contract.

마. 그러나 이후 D과의 불화로 인하여 D이 2015. 2. 20. ‘이 사건 뮤지컬을 마무리하자’는 취지로 피고에게 말하였고, 이에 피고도 2015. 2. 24. D, E, G, F에게 이 사건 뮤지컬 제작이 중단되었음을 공지함으로써 사실상 이 사건 뮤지컬 제작은 중단되었으며, 주식회사 에니웍스 역시 2015. 3. 2. 대관료 1차 계약금 지급의 지체를 이유로 위 극장대관계약을 해제하였다

The evidence submitted in this case alone is what is the cause of extinguishment with D and who is responsible therefor.