beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.12.22 2015고단1563

사기

Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon District Court on April 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 12, 2015.

[2015 Highest 1563 Fraud] The Defendant, who worked as a civilian military employee belonging to U.S. military forces, told the victim C to find a civilian military employee belonging to the U.S. military unit at a mutually unclaimed restaurant located in the flying-dong during Ansan-si on June 12, 2014, the Defendant told the victim C to find employment of the amount of KRW 15 million as a civilian military employee belonging to the U.S. military unit.

However, even if the defendant receives money, he did not have an intention or ability to find the victim as a civilian military employee of the USF military unit.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim, and was transferred 15 million won to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on June 12, 2014 from the victim under the pretext of employment solicitation.

[2015 Highest 1802 Fraudulent]

1. Around April 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) called the victim D by phoneing the victim D at a remote area not exceeding Songpa-gu Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul (Seoul) for employment of KRW 30 million in the U.S. military unit.

However, even if the defendant receives money, he did not have the intention or ability to find the victim in the military unit.

Ultimately, the Defendant, as seen above, was accused of the victim, and was transferred 30 million won to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on April 29, 2013 under the pretext of employment solicitation.

2. On May 24, 2013, the Defendant: “Around May 24, 2013, the Defendant of KRW 10 million was able to pay off the Defendant the phone to the victim as set forth in the preceding paragraph with the phone.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay in money immediately even if he/she borrowed money from the victim due to the financial standing of the company operated at the time and the amount of personal debt is considerable.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and deceivings it from the victim on May 24, 2013, and is a national bank under the name of the Defendant as the borrowed money.