A. Under the National Health Insurance Act, the Plaintiff is an insurer of the National Health Insurance that provides citizens with insurance benefits for the prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment, and rehabilitation of diseases and injury, for childbirth death, and for improvement of health, and Defendant D is the owner of the vehicle E (hereinafter “Defendant”), and Defendant C is the driver of the Defendant vehicle at the time of the instant accident as follows.

Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is an automobile insurance company that has acquired large 1 and 2 insurance contracts with Defendant D and Defendant vehicles by setting the insurance period from February 18, 2015 to February 18, 2016.

B. On September 2, 2015, at around 15:10 on September 2, 2015, F is proceeding along a single lane of the national highways No. 39 adjacent to H in terms of harmony (e.g., Do2 line road in which the central separation cost is installed).

In front of the driver's seat, the center separation zone was shocked, and the following vehicles were shocked by the driver's vehicle, and the driver's vehicle was shocked in front of the driver's seat by the direction of visual opposite direction.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The F (hereinafter “the Deceased”) died on November 10, 2015 while being transferred to the I University Hospital after the instant accident. The total medical expenses for the Deceased incurred due to the instant accident (i.e., KRW 108,920,980 of the Plaintiff’s Non-Health Care Benefit Amounting to KRW 10,13,014 of the Plaintiff’s Non-Health Care Benefit Amounting to KRW 16,964,736, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 23,228,850 of the Plaintiff’s Non-Health Care Benefit amounting to KRW 10,98,920,980 of the Plaintiff’s Non-Health Care Benefit Amounting to KRW 16,964,736 of the Plaintiff’s Medical Care Benefit Amounting to KRW 16,964,77,870 of the Plaintiff’s Medical Care Benefit).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 6 and Eul evidence Nos. 2 through 5, 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' arguments and the gist of grounds for appeal;

A. The Plaintiff is against the Defendants of the Deceased to the extent that the Plaintiff provided insurance benefits under the National Health Insurance Act.