A. The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The above-mentioned sentence of the prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant committed the instant crime to be consistently detained.

In light of the motive for the crime, the background of the crime, and the attitude of the statement to the investigation agency, etc., the mental disease suffered by the defendant seems to have affected the crime of this case, and these circumstances are favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case within three months after being sentenced to a suspended sentence due to interference with the execution of official duties, etc., the fact that he/she had been sentenced to a suspended sentence six times of suspended sentence due to the same crime and the crime of alien species, and has been sentenced to

In full view of such overall circumstances and other circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, etc. and the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.