The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the record, the court below is just in maintaining the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant on the ground that the prosecution was instituted after the statute of limitations has expired for each of the fraudulent acts committed on June 1, 2006 and August 24, 2006 among the facts charged in this case, and there is no error of misconception of facts or misapprehension of legal principles as to the blanket crime, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal.

On the other hand, although the prosecutor submitted a written appeal to the effect that he/she is dissatisfied with the guilty portion of the judgment below, and did not state the grounds of appeal as to that portion in the appellate brief, this part of the appeal

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.