When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On November 13, 2014, the Defendant was present at the court of Law No. 322, Nam-dong Incheon District Court of Law No. 322, Nam-gu, Incheon, and testified after taking an oath. On May 12, 2014, the Defendant was dissatisfied with E, etc. on the ground that the husband F of E and E did not reside in the above Bara on May 16, 2014, while he did not reside in the 2nd E and E’s 2nd E’s Dara, Incheon, the court of Law No. 2014 high-level 2608 high-level 2608 high-level 3, and testified. At the time, the Defendant did not inform the Defendant of his testimony at the time of complaint (hereinafter “the Defendant’s testimony at the time of complaint”) by the Prosecutor’s “I wish to report to E” and “I wish to report to E” (the Defendant’s testimony at the time of complaint).

Accordingly, the defendant gave false testimony contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Protocol of examination of witness;

1. Stenographic recording and reporting, and application of statutes governing the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the crime that obstructs the discovery of truth through a trial should be punished strictly, the fact that the serious reflectivity cannot be seen, etc. is disadvantageously unfair, and that perjury does not affect the result of the trial, and that it does not constitute a de facto marriage with C and C, the defendant of the case present as a witness.