A. The sentence of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is advantageous to the defendant's confession and reflects the defendant's criminal act, payment of KRW 12 million to the victim, etc., but the defendant can be subject to criminal punishment including the same criminal records, including the defendant's criminal records. Since the defendant stolen the iron plates equivalent to approximately KRW 350 million over 10 million over 3 months in collaboration with his accomplices, the defendant's liability for the crime is not less severe, and the defendant's punishment is not less than the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments, such as sentencing against the accomplices, and it cannot be deemed that the court below's punishment is too weak or unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and the prosecutor's argument are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.