However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 28, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 5 million from the Jeonju District Court due to a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On September 25, 2012, a fine of KRW 3 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 5 million by the same court on December 12, 2013, respectively.

On January 11, 2015, at around 21:20, the Defendant driven a private loan in Geumjin-gu, Geumjin-gu, Geumjin-gu, Seoul, with the front of the road, and the front of the Gu unit from around 2km to the front of the 641 water delivery station, with approximately 0.181% of blood alcohol concentration, while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on detection of a suspect in violation of the Road Traffic Act;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Response to the request for appraisal;

1. A report on detection of a host driver;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records and other inquiries and investigation reports (a copy of a summary order)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigations under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that he/she seriously reflects wrongs and the fact that he/she has no criminal record exceeding the fine);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the grounds for discretionary mitigation);

1. Probation, order to provide community service and attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;