If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, 50,000 won.

Defendant

On September 28, 2012, A was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch on September 28, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 6, 2012.

1. Defendants A and B conspired with C to open a cellular phone in the victim’s name with Defendant A and B’s joint criminal conduct. Defendant B conspired with each other to sell the cell phone in the victim’s name.

On March 22, 2012, Defendants and C visited F in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E, and drafted a new service contract, etc. as if Defendant B would normally pay the mobile phone cost according to the victim’s happiness.

However, the fact does not have the intention or ability to pay the installment cost of the device even if it purchases only one mobile phone.

Defendants and C, as above, by deceiving G, who is an employee of the said F, received a delivery of cellular phone (gallonian, market value of 99,900 won) from G.

2. Defendant B

A. Defendant B, at the same date, at the same time and place as above paragraph 1, entered the SK Telecom Service new contract with the victim D’s cell phone number into a test color, entered “D” in the customer column, “H” in the resident registration number column, and “Y 203 Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City,” and entered “D” in the customer column, and entered “D” in the customer column and carried out a private person next thereto.

On the sales contract of a device, the defendant continued to enter "D", "H" and "J" in the name column of customer information for purchase, "D" in the name column of customer information for purchase, and "D" in the application column, and entered "D" in the application column, and made a private person next to the application column.

On the written consent for the collection and use of personal location information, the Defendant continued to enter “D” in the applicant customer column, and continued to be a private person next thereto.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the defendant is a new service contract in the name of the victim D, which is a private document on the duty of rights.