A. Of the misunderstanding of facts, the entertainment room was entered the entertainment room due to the difficulty of Audio pulmonon, and the hidden car and pipe was used twice, and there was no intention to destroy and damage property.

B. The lower court’s sentence of a fine of KRW 500,00 is too heavy as a recipient of basic livelihood on the basis of unreasonable sentencing.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택 ㆍ 조사한 증거에 의하며, 피해자는 오락실을 잠시 비웠다가 돌아와 펌프기계의 발판이 고장 나 있는 것을 발견하고서 매장 CCTV 확인을 통해 피고인이 펌프기계에 고정된 파이프를 흔들어 파손시키는 장면을 확인하고 경찰에 신고한 사실, 피고인은 경찰에서 “바람을 쐬러 나갔다가 오락실 문이 열려있어서 들어갔는데, 예전에 공사장에서 일하던 아쉬바(쇠파이프)가 생각이 나고 그 때가 떠올라 나도 모르게 그 쇠파이프를 잡고 밀고 당기고 하였다”고 진술하였고, 원심 법정에서도 공소사실을 자백한 사실을 인정할 수 있다.

According to the above facts of recognition, the intention of causing property damage can be recognized, and there is no error of misunderstanding the facts charged by the court below as guilty.

The defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. Compared to the first instance court’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing, and where the first instance court’s sentencing does not exceed the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). Based on the foregoing legal doctrine, the Defendant had been punished by imprisonment or a fine on 17 occasions due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, obstruction of performance of official duties, and a crime of damage to public goods, etc., and there is no new circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial, and the Defendant’s age, character, character, and environment.