For reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted of the facts charged in this case on the ground that it does not constitute a crime.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations, and did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “act which does not contravene social rules” as prescribed in Article 20 of the Criminal Act, and by omitting judgment,

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.