beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.08.23 2014가단34029

공사대금 등

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 50,320,00 and annual 5% from October 3, 2014 to August 23, 2016 to the Plaintiff and the following day.

Reasons

1. Determination on the claim for construction cost of KRW 50,320,000

A. On May 15, 2014, the Plaintiff’s claim (mutual name: C) entered into a contract with the Plaintiff for construction of an urban-type residential housing (hereinafter “Gamamamamamam) at Jung-do-Eup with the amount of KRW 143,00,000 for total construction cost, among the construction works of an urban-type residential housing (hereinafter “Gamamamamamamamam-type residential housing construction”) and completed the said construction by modifying the agreement that only the “Gemines, sridges, remote areas, and scam-type construction,” among the construction works, “Gam-type residential housing construction works” as KRW 143,00,000 for total construction cost. Since the above construction cost was not paid to the Plaintiff, the Defendant, the ordering person, was obligated to pay the construction cost directly to the Plaintiff.

B. Therefore, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged in light of the overall purport of pleadings, are to newly construct an urban-type residential housing unit-type building of six stories on the land owned by the non-party E around March 2012 (hereinafter "the building and construction of the building of this case and new construction of the building of this case"), and the construction contract was entered into between the non-party F Company and the non-party F Bank of Korea and the non-party F Bank of Korea for the construction of the construction of the construction of the 6th urban-type residential housing unit-type building on the land owned by the non-party E (hereinafter "the construction of the building of this case and new construction of the building of this case"), although the above companies renounced the construction of the above construction due to financial depression, they decided to directly perform the construction of the above E, and first lend the name of the cryp construction to the name of the crypian and the alteration of the construction contract directly between the subcontractor and the new construction of the new construction of the building of this case and the construction of the new construction of the new construction of the 4.5.